|
IASTE Home
People
Staff
Advisory Board
Conferences
2008 Conference
Past Conferences
Publications
TDSR
Working Paper Series
Books
Outreach Videos
Ordering
Information
Links To
Related Organizations
Search |
|
Back issues can be ordered for $22.50

Volume 3.2
DISAPPEARING
DICHOTOMIES:
FIRST WORLD-THIRD WORLD, TRADITIONAL-MODERN
Janet Abu-Lughod
In recent years facile, popular dichotomies such as that dividing First
World and Third World, traditional and modern, have been strained to the
breaking point. An important trend in today’s increasingly interconnected
world is the decreased congruence between spatial location and social
formation. Parts of the economies of so-called Third World countries are
now closely connected to an international, First World circuit of trade,
technology and finance at the same time that they are tied through intricate
subcontracting to local, “traditional” circuits. Such patterns have also
emerged in the First World, and will no doubt appear in the former Second
World. The purpose of this paper is to reconceptualize terms related to the
old dichotomies, paying special attention to the notion of the
“traditional.” This is seen as a quality more related to process than
product.
REBIRTH OF A RAJPUT
VILLAGE
Paul Oliver
Housing the homeless after disasters frequently demonstrates external and
state architectural intervention in a vernacular tradition. Often, as in
Gediz, Turkey, this results in culturally inappropriate house design and may
incur settlement relocation. Indigenous capacities to recover and rebuild
are frequently overlooked. The self-regeneration of Jubbo, a Rajput village
in the Pakistan Punjab, demonstrates this ability to recover and rebuild.
This article compares the results of a postdisaster study of Jubbo with a
study made shortly before the village was destroyed in a flood. It
concludes by indicating where external assistance rather than intervention
could be most beneficial.
AESTHETIC POLITICS:
SHANTYTOWN OR NEW VERNACULAR?
Lisa R. Peattie
The world we see is for us always both form and significance. Our aesthetic
experience reflects both. Thus, there is a political aspect to aesthetics
and an aesthetic aspect to political judgment and political struggle. This
article reviews the aesthetic politics around Third World popular
settlements. I review first the way settlements are “seen” in the
literature of academic analysis. Then I show how it was possible for me to
see the fragile beauty in a squatter dwelling and why this perception was
impossible for others. Finally, I suggest how designers could help
legitimize the claim of poor people to the city by aesthetic politics.
ON CULTURAL
LANDSCAPES
Amos Rapoport
In this largely conceptual paper it is argued that cultural landscapes are
the subject matter in the study of environment-behavior relations generally,
and in the study of traditional dwellings and settlements specifically. The
concept of cultural landscape is clarified by discussing its two components
— “landscape” and “cultural.” A number of important consequences of making
cultural landscapes the subject are then discussed. These include insights
about the components of cultural landscapes that produce their character and
ambience; how perception of cultural landscapes relates to modes of travel
and, hence, to changes in technology and other aspects of culture; insights
into the nature of design as a process; discussion of the role of ordering
systems and, hence, a clarification of how cross-cultural studies should be
done; and, finally, advocacy of the study of high style and vernacular, and
the relations between them, together. This last strategy, it is argued, is
essential if either is to be understood.
FROM EXPLOITATION OF THE
FOREST TO URBAN
DEPENDENCE
IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA
Christian Coiffier
For centuries European intrusion has profoundly modified the socioeconomic
structures of the peoples of the Sepik region of Papua New Guinea. One
effect has been that many villagers now immigrate to new urban areas. Until
the 1970s the construction techniques of the Sepik peoples were solely based
on the exploitation of their physical environment (forest, swamps, river).
At the present time, however, those who live in urban zones have become
dependent on the town for their food and housing. Meanwhile, those who
remain in the villages import more and more manufactured products from the
city.
|
|