|
IASTE Home
People
Staff
Advisory Board
Conferences
2008 Conference
Past Conferences
Publications
TDSR
Working Paper Series
Books
Outreach Videos
Ordering
Information
Links To
Related Organizations
Search |
|
Back issues can be ordered for $22.50

Volume 7.1
CREATING
ONE'S FUTURE FROM ONE'S PAST: NONDEFENSIVELY
Janet L. Abu-Lughod
“There
are people who have created for themselves a romantic picture of a glorious
past that is far from accurate. They wish to see the living Indian return
to an age that has long passed and they resent any changes in his art.”
“To rob a people of tradition is to rob it of inborn strength and identity.
To rob a people of opportunity to grow through invention or through
acquisition of values from other races is to rob it of its future.”
— Frederick
Douglas and Rene d'Harnoncourt, curators of the 1941 “Indian Art in the
United States” exhibit at the Museum of Modern Art, New York.
This paper is essentially an expanded exegesis based on the trenchant
quotation above, which was on display at the new Indian Museum when it
opened in the “old” (nineteenth-century!) Alexander Hamilton Customs House
in lower Manhattan, New York, in the fall of 1994.
FROM VERNACULARISM TO GLOBALISM: THE TEMPORAL REALITY OF TRADITIONAL
SETTLEMENTS
Nezar AlSayyad
The changes that the world has undergone over the past two decades have
created a new global order which requires a dramatically altered
understanding of the role of traditional settlements in the reconstruction
of history. Using a model which is based on recognizing the historic
inevitability of dominant relationships between the so-called First and
Third Worlds, the paper proposes four historic phases relevant to the study
of traditional settlements: the insular period, the colonial period, the era
of independence and nation-building, and the present era of globalization.
Four accompanying settlement forms — the indigenous vernacular, the hybrid,
the modern or pseudo-modern, and the postmodern — are identified and linked
to these historic periods. The paper examines the evolution of the concept
of national identity and its use in understanding the changes that
traditional settlements have undergone. It suggests that the condition of
hybridity introduced during the colonial period have reconfigured indigenous
forms. It also suggests that the influences of modernity accompanying
nation-building and independence movements have resulted in the reinvention
of various traditions. It concludes that in the era of globalization the
forms of settlements are likely to reflect rising levels of awareness of the
ethnic, racial and religious associations of the communities within which
they exist.
BODY, SETTLEMENT, LANDSCAPE: A COMPARISON OF HOT AND COOL HUMID
PATTERNS
Robert Mugerauer
This article presents the findings of a cross-climatic, cross-cultural
phenomenological study of bodily experiences, built form and settlement
patterns, and hot-humid and cool-humid landscapes. It results from field
work in the rain forests of the Yucatan Peninsula of Mexico and the Olympic
Peninsula north and west of Seattle, U.S.A. For these two rain forest areas
the article describes and interprets the embodied life-world experiences of
the climatic realm (both physiological and culturally modulated); the
characteristics of the specific rain forest environment; and the correlation
of these dimensions with both housing materials, structures and uses and
settlement orientations and forms. Finally, the article proposes tentative
points of similarity and difference between the two humid environments
studied. An empirical gestalt emerges: with interesting differences, both
coherent indigenous worlds are complex, heterogeneous, and “closed-in.”
These characteristics are quite opposite to the modern, Western conception
of space as the homogeneous context for “preferred” clear and distinct
perception and behavior.
THE AMERICAN RANCH HOUSE: TRADITIONAL DESIGN METHOD IN MODERN POPULAR
CULTURE
Thomas C. Hubka
The ranch house, as it developed in American suburban communities after
World War II, is a curious hybrid. On the one hand, it represented an
embodiment in physical form of the traditional values of those middle-class
Americans who freely chose it for a living environment and for whom it
represented the fulfillment of a social ideals. And yet the ranch house
cannot be said to be a “traditional” building type in the historical sense.
It owed much to both modern aesthetic ideas and modern means of production.
At a time when single-family homeownership is becoming an increasingly
global aspiration, it is important to understand how the ranch house
provided a reconciliation between the forces of vernacularism and
modernism. Despite elitist aesthetic critiques and critiques of the society
that created it, the ranch house was the confident product of confident
communities.
CYCLES OF SUSTENANCE IN TRADITIONAL ARCHITECTURE
Suha Özkan
A major achievement of traditional environments research over the past
decades has been to show how forms of building cannot be understood outside
broader socio-cultural and economic contexts. It has led to an
understanding of how observable built environments reflect underlying cycles
of behavior. Such a relationship is documented in this study of the
transformation of Akçaalan, a village on the Bodrum Peninsula in southern
Anatolia. Over the last twenty years long-standing cultural cycles of
sustenance centered around water distribution and grain production have been
broken or disrupted as a result of the fundamental change in the area from
an agricultural to a tourist economy. The research shows that architectural
idioms can only be preserved when corresponding social, economic and
cultural activities are sustained and developed. If the new tourist economy
of the area were now to decline, older historical cycles that tied people to
the land and led to a distinctive local architectural idiom could not be
restored.
|
|